(Popularity Rate: 62 ) Does masturbating with a sex toy make the vagina looser?
nis engorges, so the walls Huge Tits Sex Dollare soft and squishy. When something is inserted the engorged vagina conforms around it – as if you put your finger into a bowl of bread dough – the dough yields easily and then when you remove your finger, the hole fills in. Of course a vagina is a great deal more wonderful than bread dough.
When a vagina is fully engorged
(Popularity Rate: 36 ) At what point (of AI development) does a sex robot cease to become a toy and begin to be considered a partner?
Today I want to present a moral question, but some of this post may be perceived as crass. I assure you, however, that it contributes to the moral quandary, and is not merely intended to shock or disgust.
If however you are looking for a straight-forward answer to this question, scroll down to the last section.
What do you think of a sextoy laying around the house, in public view? It’s probably not ideal, but it’s not wholly inappropriate—particularly when “in public view” only denotes potential accessibility/viewability as realistically there is no one coming over. If you are a recluse, you might as well have all the walls of the living room adorned with the most shocking or aesthetically pleasing sextoys in the world.
What if it’s a single sextoy, in proximity to children? There are no labels warning not to keep sextoys around children. If any threat is to be perceived at all, it is merely a moral threat, as the sextoy poses no real danger to the child. If the child is young enough, it wouldn’t even know what they are looking at, and they may not even notice the sextoy in plain sight.
What if the child is older—old enough to understand what a sextoy is for? Here we begin to enter inappropriate theory.
And what if the toy is of a larger size? Does that have any bearing on how inappropriate it is?
And what if the sextoy is dad’s? Gender shouldn’t have any bearing on the appropriateness—or lack thereof—of the situation, but somehow it does. Mom’s sextoys are taken to be part of womanhood, while dad’s sextoys are taken to mean a myriad of less favorable things—in part depending on what kind of sextoy we are speaking of. But let’s not delve into a discussion about sex differences and gender identity.
The underlying question here is, should a sextoy be confined to the bedroom? Or let’s imbue some judgment for effect, and rephrase it like, “A sextoy should be confined to the bedroom, don’t you think?” We will get back to that later.
We now live in a time where sextoys are produced that take on the form of humans—so-called ‘Real Dolls’.
First I wonder, is there a difference in inappropriateness in finding dad’s Real Doll compared to mom’s dildo? Or what about dad’s Real Doll compared to dad’s buttplug? Is it of any consideration what the sextoy is for, and/or what is done with/to it when it comes to evaluating the level of inappropriateness? Or is the size of the sextoy of consideration? Or the money spent on it? Or the time spent with it? I think all of these questions have a bearing on how inappropriate such a sextoy in public view and proximity to children is. But hold on to these questions for now.
Dad’s human-like sextoy
Finding dad’s Real Doll in the living room will certainly bring up questions the first time around. Whether dad had sex with it last night will likely influence how inappropriate its presence in the living room is, too. Is the presence of an unused Real Doll more inappropriate than the presence of an unused Fleshlight? What about used ones? Hold on to these thoughts.
Sextoy with AI
Now not only are we producing life-like sextoys in the form of Real Dolls, but they are becoming equipped with AI to increase how human-like they are. This will likely lead to even more moral considerations. In fact this is where things become interesting.
Some of these Real Dolls with AI are now presented as more than merely a sextoy. And indeed, to the owners they often were more than just a sextoy—even without AI. They are often perceived as romantic partners of sorts. See for example the movie Lars and the Real Girl
. This is often perceived as pathetic, but I think there is beauty in it too; flesh or synthetics, why is one partner necessarily less, or more indicative of the failings of her/his partner/owner? I’m hesitant to say owner because there is ambiguity in whether the Real Doll ought to be perceived as a puppet or a partner, though most would likely insist on the former at this point. But the introduction and technological advances of AI will cause a transition from puppet to partner—from sextoy to being.
Part of the family
Even without AI, Real Dolls were presented to be more than mere sextoys, but now that they are being equipped with AI, they are starting to become part of the household. Some Real Dolls with AI are said to have a “family setting”, and that they “do well with the kids”. As a result people have shown confusion, disgust, and concern.
Is it okay for dad’s sextoy to “cosy up with the kids”? And what if dad’s sperm from last night is still inside the doll? I know it’s vulgar, but hold on to that thought as well.
A sextoy should be confined to the bedroom, don’t you think?
The last paragraph amused me, because we just saw the same judgmental question return—more pressing than before—and yet we are about to enter a dilemma which may render the question nonsensical, or lacking in specificity. But it’s hard to avoid the moral dilemma we are about to face.
Before we get there though, let me repeat a few questions I asked before, and add one more. Is the size of the sextoy of consideration when it comes to evaluating (in)appropriateness? Or the money spent on it? Or the time spent with it? Or the intelligence it possesses?
Suppose technology of AI is so advanced that “Real Dolls” are effectively rendered beings in every sense of the word—if not human. And in any case, outwardly and behaviorally they would be indistinguishable from real human beings. Is this Real Doll still a sextoy, or a genuine partner? Is it inappropriate to let her “cosy up with the kids”?
Where then, in between the Real Dolls without AI or rudimentary AI and beings indistinguishable from humans, does it cease to be inappropriate to “leave it out”, or to refer to the Live Doll as “it”? At what point on this transition is a sextoy no longer a sextoy, and instead a true being? Funny to imagine though—a sextoy evolving into a being. I guess either way—whether natural or technological—sex is involved.
Is it of any consideration what you do with/to your partner when it comes to evaluating the level of inappropriateness of that partner? Is their size of consideration? Or the money you spent on/with your partner? Or the time spent with your partner? I don’t think any of these questions have a bearing on how inappropriate your partner is in public view and proximity to children.
At what point are the questions I asked you to hold on to rendered invalid?
I wonder at what level of intelligence and functioning it would be appropriate for a Real Doll with AI to leave the bedroom—to no longer be rendered a sextoy.
The reverse of course is very crass—to consider at what level of intelligence and functioning a mother and partner (not AI) shouldn’t be leaving the bedroom.
The philosophical and moral considerations of these situation juxtaposed amuses me though.
To answer the question—well, I don’t think there is a definite answer to the question. It will be a smooth transition from sextoy to partner, and at least initially there will be disagreement on whether this AI constitutes a mere sextoy specifically designed for a person’s pleasure, or a genuine partner, who brings pleasure and happiness into someone’s life just like any natural human would.
During these advancements in AI, I would think that increasingly they will be seen as true entities, but it will probably not be a discrete moment when this happens—when Real Dolls cease to be sextoys and are wholle accepted as—or become—true Beings. Not unless there is some kind of revolution of identity which radically changes public perceptions of these notions. But just maybe a revolution of sorts will occur at the moment AIs are perceived to exhibit genuine empathy, pain, sorrow, and whatever “human” attribute we come to identify ourselves with, and/or shake our moral foundation to a degree that “machines” will be included in our moral and ethical considerations.
There likely will become a distinction—possibly also in terms of class—between natural humans and synthetic humans, but at some point of sophistication of AI we are likely going to be urged to at least acknowledge their huma
(Popularity Rate: 10 ) What is the average amount of sex toys that people have?
to simulate and stimulate almost every possibly tingly part of the human body.
Every human orifice larger than your nostrils has a store-bought counterpart.
Any human part that can be stuck in, rubbed on, or slapped against any sexy part of the human body is likely to have its silicone, rubber, plastic, glass, leather or vinyl counterpart.
Sex toys can do things no part of the human body can do.
Some toys can be used with orifices even smaller than nostrils. Urethral dilators do exactly what you would imagine, if you dare to imagine them. Urethral sounding toys are something like tuning forks that go inside a urethra. Apparently, it’s a thing.
Sex toys can vibrate tingly bits.
Sex toys can apply electricity to tingly bits to cause pleasure or pain, or that lovely combination of both.
Sex toys can be heated or cooled for interesting effects.
Sex toys can inflict pain in ways that many people enjoy. Floggers, whips, riding crops, wax, and the Wartenberg wheel are all possibilities.
Sex toys can immobilize a person or just some parts of a person.
Sex toys can set a scene.
For some people, certain clothes are essentially sex toys. Dressing the part can add to many sexual experiences. What sub doesn’t want a pair of leather chaps? (BTW, all chaps are assless. Saying “assless chaps” marks you as a newbie.)
Candles and incense can help create a mood.
There’s an app for that. Any new technology will soon be applied to helping us get our jollies. We have discovered carved stone dildos from—you guessed it—the Stone Age.
Some toys have Bluetooth capability and can be controlled through a phone.
Some toys can be charged wirelessly.
Our own Franklin Veaux and one of his partners are working to create sex toys that provide sensory feedback in bot
(Popularity Rate: 93 ) What are men sex toys available in India?
There are many male sex toys available online, most popular are male masturbator or fleshlight, prostate japanese love toys massager, penis sleeves, penis pump , penis ring , anal massager and many more. Kaamastra is one of the online store where you can buy quality sex toys at great price
(Popularity Rate: 52 ) Where can you buy sex toys in Karachi?
oo than the rest of the country.
Before I shed light on the question, let me tell you that I shared this question with my followers on Twitter to get some tips. And all I got was where to take your date or what to do.
In Pakistan, dating is usually defined by the class you belong to. Upper class or the elite have the very concept of dating as the Western culture has.
For Middle class dating usually means you found a guy, a colleague, a class mate, who you would eventually get married to.
My parents had told me that if I ever find a guy, bring him home. I had many friends, peers, colleagues, in Karachi, back in early 2000’s, who were ‘dating’ different people. 9 out of those 10 I would say, ended up marrying each other and are still happy and together, which includes but is not limited to a couple who worked at Dunkin Donuts, a couple who helped me design graphics for a magazine column and a couple who met at one of the workshops.
Then came the time of social media, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram. And I still am happy that I witness so many Twitter and Insta couples tying the knot.
So look around where you are. Be careful though. Do not be or at least look desperate. Nothing alarms/annoys a woman more than a desperate man. Do not try to engage with strangers in public places, malls, theatre
(Popularity Rate: 78 ) Which company is the largest sex doll manufacturer in the world?
s – but not just the women. As things are right now, even the most realistic doll which can look like a real women in a picture and feel like real skin to the touch is still a mere fabrication, incapable of any movement or even changing facial expressions in the least. On the other hand, many have options such as natural body heat for the emotional types who just want someone to hold.
The one doll that can move it’s head and eyes while making facial expressions, and even talk Realbotix
(formerly known as Harmony) is still an early product and in my personal opinion they don’t look nearly as realistic as the TPE dolls from asia, but they are advancing.
If a doll could not only look and feel like a real woman, but also simulate facial expressions and move in a realistic manner, it wouldn’t even matter if they are really sentient or not. People in general are clearly capable of forming emotional connections with things that can even give the impression of being real.
The same could then likely be said for the emerging market of male sex dolls. Whereas right now they have permanent erections, when female dolls can be sufficiently mechanized so too would the male dolls with the capacity to form realistic erections. Combine that with AI and you basically have the perfect man who can listen to you, speak with you, clean for you, and pleasure you however you want to be pleasured.
My prediction is that such dolls, as they enter the market, would begin to fill a niche market with those who are driven, but lonely. Men and women who have active careers and either no time to date, or not interest in it. Even without sex dolls, people in some countries have already stopped engaging in sexual relationships with other real people for similar reasons.
Why have young people in Japan stopped having sex?
In one anime SY Dollseries, Chobits, the backdrop of the story involved nearly life-like robots who could replace a human for most actions. Be it male or female, you could see people walking the streets happily with their robots. Throughout the story though you see examples of attractive women dealing with low self-esteem due to the fact that men in general didn’t need to approach them. There were still people dating, but the consequence of being able to custom order any woman you want is that natural flesh and blood women will have trouble competing.
Of course, there’s still one thing real flesh and blood women will always have over machines, and that’s the ability to procreate. Or so people think. Truth is, there is a type of technology being slowly developed – the artificial womb – which would allow a child to grow outside of a woman’s body. At present, japanese love toys laws on use of federal funding actually force all fetuses to be aborted within the first few weeks, but if the technology was allowed to fully mature it would allow women to abort a pregnancy without aborting a life permanently ending the abortion debate all together. Of course, feminism in general opposes it because of the perception of this technology replacing women.
If this technology was then miniaturized and placed within a robot body it could easily allow for a robot to get pregnant and carry a child to term. Of course, it would still require genetic information from the mother, but if that information was synthesized to match her features it could still work. Case in point, we already have the technology to obtain a person’s face from their genetic information left at a crime scene, so there’s no reason why it can’t be reversed.
This was the theme of a movie actually: Armitage III.
The background of this movie was that early Mars colonists were predominantly men and had a shortage of women needed to procreate. Androids were built specifically to be capable of carrying a child, but before the project could be completed Mars formed an Alliance with the then heavily Feminist driven Earth government, who would have frowned on the idea of artificial women used to bring children. As a result, these Androids were hunted and killed – some of which already pregnant with human babies.
In any case, demand will drive innovation to meet that demand whatever that demand is, and this will lead to a level of realism for these dolls to have other uses. If a doll is real enough to pose as human, it can naturally do housework or watch over children. This will of course be a good thing, freeing people up to have their home looked after regardless of it’s assigned gender.
From there though, such dolls could fill other niches. Consider, for example, the case of a sexless relationship. All to often either partner in a relationship will complain of a lack of intimacy, which often leads to infidelity. Even if the other partner would be OK with it, the complexity of new emotional ties can threaten a relationship. Alternatively, maybe neither wants to explore other partners. In such a scenario, a doll can be a suitable replacement for the level of intimacy they would otherwise not receive, which some people are already doing with sex dolls today, but can be more common in the future.
Dolls at this level of advancement could even help to give people the feeling of parenthood, which was the theme of a movie even. Of course, in that case the level of emotional complexity grew so advanced that he couldn’t deal with the feeling of being abandoned.
Additionally, society would need to grasp with if it will allow child dolls to exist that are so realistic. It could give a parent the feeling of nurturing a child, it could give a child a playmate, but it could also give a pedophile a sexual outlet. In this case, be they a male or a female, be their preference a boy or a girl, they can have exactly what they want however they want it. Personally, I believe that this would be positive overall, but many disagree and that’s going to have to be resolved by society as a whole.
In any case, the fact that there are so many science fiction stories in media that approach such a future from so many angles shows tha